In the pursuit of understanding thermal runaway events in lithium-ion batteries, test engineers in the laboratory are diligently exploring various methods to replicate and analyze this phenomenon. This pivotal event, which holds significant implications for battery safety, necessitates a thorough understanding to devise effective preventive measures. In the controlled environment of the test lab, diligent efforts are being made to replicate and analyze thermal runaway using several methods, including nail penetration, surface heating, and overcharging.
Notably, a compelling study conducted by researcher Wei D. et al. has yielded valuable insights into the effects of these initiation techniques. The Extended Volume Accelerating Rate Calorimetry (EV-ARC) test was used by them to compare the results with other practical methods. The findings from this research provide invaluable knowledge that can greatly contribute to the advancement of lithium-ion battery technology. As engineers and researchers striving to enhance battery safety and performance, it is crucial for us to familiarize ourselves with the key outcomes of this study.
Key Findings: Cell-Level Analysis (NMC)
Maximum temperatures recorded during the abuse methods were:
- Nail penetration: 964.3 °C
- Side heating: 1020 °C
- Overcharge: Severe damage, broken thermocouple
- EV-ARC test: 994.8 °C
Comparison of Severity:
- The overcharge abuse test caused the most severe damage to the cell, as evidenced by the experimental observations.
- Side heating abuse resulted in higher temperatures due to the introduction of additional thermal energy.
- Nail penetration abuse exhibited the least severe behavior among the three abuse methods.
Module-Level Analysis:
The behaviors of thermal runaway propagation (TRP) using the abuse methods differed during the early stages of TRP.
- The first two TR cells in the module were more affected by the abuse method, while the behaviors of the last two cells were similar.
- The triggered cell in the module exhibited a higher rate of mass loss compared to the other cells.
Comparative Hazard Ranking of Abuse Methods:
- At the cell level, overcharge abuse was identified as the most hazardous, followed by side heating abuse, with nail penetration abuse being the least severe.
- Regarding TRP triggered by the abuse methods too, overcharge abuse was found to be the most hazardous, followed by side heating abuse, and nail penetration abuse was the least severe.
Mitigating overcharge abuse is of utmost importance to reduce the risk of severe damage and safety incidents. Further research and development efforts are essential to improve battery designs and implement effective safety measures.
Commentaires